Alcazar Amusement Co. v. Pereira

Appellate Court of Illinois

Alcazar Amusement Co. v. Pereira

194 Ill. App. 507

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedOctober 5, 1915

DocketGen. No. 20,188

StatusPublished

This text of 194 Ill. App. 507 (Alcazar Amusement Co. v. Pereira) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alcazar Amusement Co. v. Pereira, 194 Ill. App. 507 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Contracts, § 351*—when action may he maintained on invalid writing. An action on an invalid written contract may be maintained if there is in the statement of claim an allegation of a verbal contract sufficient to support the action. 3. Appearance, § 12*—when confers jurisdiction. In an action where defendant has entered an appearance, held error to allow a motion to dismiss on the ground of want of jurisdiction, for the reason that in such case the court has jurisdiction to try all issues.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Contracts, § 351*—when action may he maintained on invalid writing. An action on an invalid written contract may be maintained if there is in the statement of claim an allegation of a verbal contract sufficient to support the action. 3. Appearance, § 12*—when confers jurisdiction. In an action where defendant has entered an appearance, held error to allow a motion to dismiss on the ground of want of jurisdiction, for the reason that in such case the court has jurisdiction to try all issues.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 Ill. App. 507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alcazar-amusement-co-v-pereira-illappct-1915.