Alcaraz v. Mukasey
This text of 285 F. App'x 443 (Alcaraz v. Mukasey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Roberto Rubio Alcaraz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the [444]*444Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his untimely motion to reopen. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision not to exercise its sua sponte authority to reopen proceedings. See Ekimian v. INS, 303 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir.2002).
To the extent Rubio Alcaraz challenges the BIA’s March 11, 2003 order, we lack jurisdiction because this petition is not timely as to that order. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1). We previously reviewed this order in No. 03-71310, Rubio Alcaraz v. Gonzales, 123 Fed.Appx. 330 (9th Cir.2005).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
285 F. App'x 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alcaraz-v-mukasey-ca9-2008.