Alcaraz v. Mukasey

285 F. App'x 443
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 11, 2008·No. No. 05-77156·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Roberto Rubio Alcaraz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the [444] Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his untimely motion to reopen. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision not to exercise its sua sponte authority to reopen proceedings. See Ekimian v. INS, 303 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir.2002).

To the extent Rubio Alcaraz challenges the BIA’s March 11, 2003 order, we lack jurisdiction because this petition is not timely as to that order. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1). We previously reviewed this order in No. 03-71310, Rubio Alcaraz v. Gonzales, 123 Fed.Appx. 330 (9th Cir.2005).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alcaraz v. Mukasey, 285 F. App'x 443 (9th Cir. 2008).

285 F. App'x 443 (Alcaraz v. Mukasey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related