Albury v. State

503 So. 2d 460, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 732, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12041
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 10, 1987·No. No. 86-769·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court departed from the recommended guidelines sentence of two-and-a-half to three-and-a-half years imprisonment and sentenced Albury to ten years imprisonment upon a finding that Albury was a habitual offender. In Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla.1986), decided after the trial court imposed sentence on Albury, the Florida Supreme Court held that the habitual offender statute, § 775.084, Fla.Stat. (1985), is neither an alternative to guidelines sentencing nor an adequate reason for departure from the recommended guidelines sentence. Whitehead thus compels reversal of the sentence and a remand for [461]*461resentencing within the recommended guidelines.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Albury v. State, 503 So. 2d 460, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 732, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12041 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

503 So. 2d 460 (Albury v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reginald L. Bryant v. State of Florida
148 So. 3d 1251 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2014)
Shull v. Dugger
515 So. 2d 748 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)
Morganti v. State
510 So. 2d 1182 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)