Albritton v. Williams

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 6, 2006·No. 06-6411·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6411

DEVINCHE ALBRITTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS S. WILLIAMS, Sergeant, Virginia Beach Sheriff’s Office; EDWARD C. RONAN, Master Deputy, Virginia Beach Sheriff’s Office,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

PAUL LANTEIGNE, Sheriff; VIRGINIA BEACH SHERIFF’S OFFICE; CORPORAL KNOX, Virginia Beach Sheriff’s Office; CORPORAL RANDOLPH, Virginia Beach Sheriff’s Office; PAMELLA K. BUSSE, Deputy, Virginia Beach Sheriff’s Office; ERIC M. CALHOUN, Deputy, Virginia Beach Sheriff’s Office; B. STROMER, Deputy, Virginia Beach Sheriff’s Office,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:05-cv-00344-JBF)

Submitted: August 31, 2006 Decided: September 6, 2006

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

DeVinche Albritton, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff Wayne Rosen, Lisa Ehrich, PENDER & COWARD, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

DeVinche Albritton appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Albritton v.

Williams, No. 2:05-cv-00344-JBF (E.D. Va. Feb. 28, 2006). We deny

Albritton’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Albritton v. Williams, (4th Cir. 2006).

Albritton v. Williams (Albritton v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related