Albritton v. Fredella

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided August 6, 2024·No. 1:22-cv-04512·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JEMAL ALBRITTON, Plaintiff, 22-cv-4512 (AS) -against- ORDER LAWRENCE FREDELLA, et al., Defendants.

ARUN SUBRAMANIAN, United States District Judge: On September 6, 2023, Plaintiff Jemal Albritton requested that the Court seal certain exhibits he attached in support of his request to file an amended complaint. Dkt. 61. None of the defendants filed an opposition to this motion, despite the Court inviting them to do so. Dkt. 55. After reviewing the documents and applying the three-part test described in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006), Albritton’s request is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Dkt. 61. SO ORDERED. Dated: August 6, 2024 New York, New York

ARUN SUBRAMANIAN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Albritton v. Fredella, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Albritton v. Fredella (Albritton v. Fredella) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)