Albritton v. Canterberry

44 Ala. 290
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 15, 1870
StatusPublished

This text of 44 Ala. 290 (Albritton v. Canterberry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Albritton v. Canterberry, 44 Ala. 290 (Ala. 1870).

Opinion

PECK, C. J.

The order and judgment of the court below, setting aside and annulling the judgment of said court, rendered at a previous term thereof, in favor of the appellant, guardian, &c., against said appellees, and taxing her with the costs, is a final judgment, upon which an appeal can be properly taken to this court.

The said order and judgment is reversed, on the authority of the case of McElvain et al. v. William Mudd, Adm'r, decided at this term, declaring the 3d section of the ordinance of the convention of this State, No. 38, passed the 6th day of December, 1867, unconstitutional and void.

[291]*291The cause is remanded to the court below, with directions to set aside and vacate said order and judgment, so rendered by said court, setting aside and annulling the said judgment rendered in favor of said appellant, guardian, &c., as aforesaid.

The appellees will pay the costs of this court and of the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 Ala. 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albritton-v-canterberry-ala-1870.