Albritton v. Albritton

103 S.W.3d 872, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 539, 2003 WL 1873569
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 15, 2003·No. No. ED 81053·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Scott Albritton (Father) appeals from a trial court Judgment and Decree of Dissolution. Father alleges that the trial court erred in its calculation of child support and child support arrearages based upon the court’s imputation of income to Father. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by imputing monthly income to Father in the amount of $3,910, and therefore it did not err in its calculation of child support and child support arrearages. Burton v. Donahue, 69 S.W.3d 76, 79 (Mo.App. E.D.2001). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Albritton v. Albritton, 103 S.W.3d 872, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 539, 2003 WL 1873569 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

103 S.W.3d 872 (Albritton v. Albritton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burton v. Donahue
69 S.W.3d 76 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2001)