Albright v. Summerlin

94 S.E. 61, 21 Ga. App. 176, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 509
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 1, 1917
Docket8916
StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.E. 61 (Albright v. Summerlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Albright v. Summerlin, 94 S.E. 61, 21 Ga. App. 176, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 509 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The charge of the court was full and fair, and the evidence authorized the verdict. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, G. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 S.E. 61, 21 Ga. App. 176, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albright-v-summerlin-gactapp-1917.