Albright v. Commissioner of Social Security

N.D. Ohio

Albright v. Commissioner of Social Security

DecidedNovember 4, 2021

Docket1:20-cv-01729

StatusUnknown

This text of Albright v. Commissioner of Social Security (Albright v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Albright v. Commissioner of Social Security, (N.D. Ohio 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

JARED LEE ALBRIGHT, ) CASE NO. 1: 20 CV 1729 Plaintiff, JUDGE DONALD C. NUGENT V. ORDER ADOPTING ) MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND ) RECOMMENDATION COMMISIONER OF ) SOCIAL SECRUITY, ) Defendants.

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker’s Report and Recommendation on Plaintiffs request for judicial review over the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of his supplemental security income (SSJ) application under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. (ECF #16). Pursuant to this referral, Magistrate Parker issued a report and recommendation recommending that the Court deny Plaintiffs request for judicial review and affirm the Commissioner’s final decision. (ECF #16). Upon careful review of the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that the Magistrate’s Order is well-supported and in accord with the applicable law.

In this case, neither party filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation, nonetheless, the Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, see Ohio Citizen Action v. City of Seven Hills, 35 F. Supp. 2d 575, 577 (N.D. Ohio 1999). The findings and conclusions contained in Magistrate Parker’s Report and Recommendation are thorough and well-supported, and are, hereby, ADOPTED for purposes of affirming the Commissioner’s decision.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Donald C. Nugent DONALD C. NUGENT United States District Judge

DATED: 11/4/2021

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

JARED LEE ALBRIGHT, ) CASE NO. 1: 20 CV 1729 Plaintiff, JUDGE DONALD C. NUGENT V. ORDER ADOPTING ) MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND ) RECOMMENDATION COMMISIONER OF ) SOCIAL SECRUITY, ) Defendants.

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker’s Report and Recommendation on Plaintiffs request for judicial review over the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of his supplemental security income (SSJ) application under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. (ECF #16). Pursuant to this referral, Magistrate Parker issued a report and recommendation recommending that the Court deny Plaintiffs request for judicial review and affirm the Commissioner’s final decision. (ECF #16). Upon careful review of the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that the Magistrate’s Order is well-supported and in accord with the applicable law.

In this case, neither party filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation, nonetheless, the Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, see Ohio Citizen Action v. City of Seven Hills, 35 F. Supp. 2d 575, 577 (N.D. Ohio 1999). The findings and conclusions contained in Magistrate Parker’s Report and Recommendation are thorough and well-supported, and are, hereby, ADOPTED for purposes of affirming the Commissioner’s decision.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Donald C. Nugent DONALD C. NUGENT United States District Judge

DATED: 11/4/2021

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Albright v. Commissioner of Social Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albright-v-commissioner-of-social-security-ohnd-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack