Albrecht v. Hadley

869 P.2d 907, 127 Or. App. 43, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 349
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMarch 16, 1994
Docket9104-02176; CA A73581
StatusPublished

This text of 869 P.2d 907 (Albrecht v. Hadley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Albrecht v. Hadley, 869 P.2d 907, 127 Or. App. 43, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 349 (Or. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff appeals from the adverse judgment in this declaratory judgment action. We reverse the attorney fees and sanctions awarded against him pursuant to ORS 20.105 and ORCP 17. The complaint and the action are not “entirely devoid of legal or factual support.” Mattiza v. Foster, 311 Or 1, 8, 803 P2d 723 (1990) (footnote omitted; emphasis supplied); see also Westfall v. Rust International, 314 Or 553, 840 P2d 700 (1992). Plaintiffs other contentions are without merit and require no discussion.

Defendant Deborah Hadley seeks damages pursuant to ORS 19.160 and sanctions pursuant to ORCP 17 for plaintiffs prosecution of this appeal. They are denied.

Award of attorney fees and sanctions pursuant to ORS 20.105 and ORCP 17 reversed; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mattiza v. Foster
803 P.2d 723 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1990)
Westfall v. Rust International & Underwriters Adjusting Co.
840 P.2d 700 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
869 P.2d 907, 127 Or. App. 43, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albrecht-v-hadley-orctapp-1994.