Albion Optical Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Albion Optical Co. v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 293, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2488

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMarch 25, 1968

DocketC.D. 3369

StatusPublished

This text of 60 Cust. Ct. 293 (Albion Optical Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Albion Optical Co. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 293, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2488 (cusc 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Maletz, Judge:

The protests enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States that the items marked “A” initialed SJS (Commodity Specialist’s Initials) by Commodity Specialist Sadami J. Sako (Commodity Specialist’s Name) on the invoices covered by the protests listed on Schedule “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof and assessed [294]*294with duty at 25 per cent ad valorem under Item 708.23 TSUS.are not mounted lenses but are in fact parts of television cameras provided for under Item 685.10 at 12.5 per cent ad valorem as claimed by plaintiff herein.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the said protests be submitted on this stipulation, the protests being limited to the items marked “A” as aforesaid.

This stipulated statement of the facts is sufficient to remove the present merchandise from the classification given by the collector and to establish the proper classification, as claimed by the plaintiffs, to be under item 685.10 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, as parts of television cameras, dutiable at the rate of 12.5 percent ad valorem.

To the extent indicated the protests are sustained and judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maletz, Judge:

The protests enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States that the items marked “A” initialed SJS (Commodity Specialist’s Initials) by Commodity Specialist Sadami J. Sako (Commodity Specialist’s Name) on the invoices covered by the protests listed on Schedule “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof and assessed [294]*294with duty at 25 per cent ad valorem under Item 708.23 TSUS.are not mounted lenses but are in fact parts of television cameras provided for under Item 685.10 at 12.5 per cent ad valorem as claimed by plaintiff herein.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the said protests be submitted on this stipulation, the protests being limited to the items marked “A” as aforesaid.

This stipulated statement of the facts is sufficient to remove the present merchandise from the classification given by the collector and to establish the proper classification, as claimed by the plaintiffs, to be under item 685.10 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, as parts of television cameras, dutiable at the rate of 12.5 percent ad valorem.

To the extent indicated the protests are sustained and judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 Cust. Ct. 293, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albion-optical-co-v-united-states-cusc-1968.