Albino v. Santaella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Albino v. Santaella

95 A.D.2d 853, 464 N.Y.S.2d 379, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18803

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 27, 1983·Published

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated November 26, 1982, which affirmed a determination of the State Division of Human Rights dismissing petitioner’s complaint for lack of probable cause. Order confirmed and proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements. On the record considered as a whole, there exists sufficient evidence to support the determination of the State Division of Human Rights that the Y.M.C.A. of Greater New York Prospect Park-Bay Ridge Branch did not engage in any unlawful discriminatory practice on the basis of sex. Damiani, J. P., Weinstein, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated November 26, 1982, which affirmed a determination of the State Division of Human Rights dismissing petitioner’s complaint for lack of probable cause. Order confirmed and proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements. On the record considered as a whole, there exists sufficient evidence to support the determination of the State Division of Human Rights that the Y.M.C.A. of Greater New York Prospect Park-Bay Ridge Branch did not engage in any unlawful discriminatory practice on the basis of sex. Damiani, J. P., Weinstein, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Albino v. Santaella, 95 A.D.2d 853, 464 N.Y.S.2d 379, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18803 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

95 A.D.2d 853 (Albino v. Santaella) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.