Albino v. Santaella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Albino v. Santaella

95 A.D.2d 853, 464 N.Y.S.2d 379, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18803

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 27, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 95 A.D.2d 853 (Albino v. Santaella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Albino v. Santaella, 95 A.D.2d 853, 464 N.Y.S.2d 379, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18803 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated November 26, 1982, which affirmed a determination of the State Division of Human Rights dismissing petitioner’s complaint for lack of probable cause. Order confirmed and proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements. On the record considered as a whole, there exists sufficient evidence to support the determination of the State Division of Human Rights that the Y.M.C.A. of Greater New York Prospect Park-Bay Ridge Branch did not engage in any unlawful discriminatory practice on the basis of sex. Damiani, J. P., Weinstein, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated November 26, 1982, which affirmed a determination of the State Division of Human Rights dismissing petitioner’s complaint for lack of probable cause. Order confirmed and proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements. On the record considered as a whole, there exists sufficient evidence to support the determination of the State Division of Human Rights that the Y.M.C.A. of Greater New York Prospect Park-Bay Ridge Branch did not engage in any unlawful discriminatory practice on the basis of sex. Damiani, J. P., Weinstein, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 A.D.2d 853, 464 N.Y.S.2d 379, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albino-v-santaella-nyappdiv-1983.