Albin v. Albin

157 S.W.3d 348, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 302, 2005 WL 406307
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 22, 2005·No. ED 84283·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donald Albin (Husband) appeals from a decree of dissolution of his marriage to Diane Albin (Wife). Husband contends the trial court erred in finding only $5,000.00 of marital funds expended on Wife’s separate property located at 442 Bush Drive where he presented evidence that $98,197.61 of marital funds was expended in improvements to the property.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Albin v. Albin, 157 S.W.3d 348, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 302, 2005 WL 406307 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

157 S.W.3d 348 (Albin v. Albin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re the Care & Treatment of Owens
157 S.W.3d 348 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)