Albicocco v. Koopmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Albicocco v. Koopmann

40 A.D.2d 700, 336 N.Y.S.2d 450, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3674

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 24, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 40 A.D.2d 700 (Albicocco v. Koopmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Albicocco v. Koopmann, 40 A.D.2d 700, 336 N.Y.S.2d 450, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3674 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action inter alia for an injunction, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered March 29, 1972, which (1) granted plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction against sale or conveyance of the business or assets of defendant Nassau Suffolk Fuel Corp. and (2) denied defendants’ cross motion for a preliminary injunction. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. In view of the claims of the parties relating to the present enforceability of the provisions of the contract of sale between Nassau Suffolk Lumber So Supply Corporation and defendant Koopmann, we are of the opinion that the preliminary injunction, stabilizing the positions of the parties, was properly granted. At the trial the facts and circumstances relating to such claims can be presented and evaluated. We express no opinion as to the validity of those claims. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Gulotta and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action inter alia for an injunction, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered March 29, 1972, which (1) granted plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction against sale or conveyance of the business or assets of defendant Nassau Suffolk Fuel Corp. and (2) denied defendants’ cross motion for a preliminary injunction. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. In view of the claims of the parties relating to the present enforceability of the provisions of the contract of sale between Nassau Suffolk Lumber So Supply Corporation and defendant Koopmann, we are of the opinion that the preliminary injunction, stabilizing the positions of the parties, was properly granted. At the trial the facts and circumstances relating to such claims can be presented and evaluated. We express no opinion as to the validity of those claims. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Gulotta and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.D.2d 700, 336 N.Y.S.2d 450, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albicocco-v-koopmann-nyappdiv-1972.