Albertype Co. v. Coundouris

City of New York Municipal Court

Albertype Co. v. Coundouris

10 Misc. 779

DecidedJuly 1, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 10 Misc. 779 (Albertype Co. v. Coundouris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Albertype Co. v. Coundouris, 10 Misc. 779 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Newbueger, J.

The only question involved in this case is, “to whom was the credit given,” and as the trial justice properly submitted the question to the jury, and no errors having heen committed on the trial that would warrant us in disturbing the verdict of the jury, the judgment appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.

Ehrlich, Oh. J., and Fitzsimohs, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Newbueger, J.

The only question involved in this case is, “to whom was the credit given,” and as the trial justice properly submitted the question to the jury, and no errors having heen committed on the trial that would warrant us in disturbing the verdict of the jury, the judgment appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.

Ehrlich, Oh. J., and Fitzsimohs, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Misc. 779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albertype-co-v-coundouris-nynyccityct-1894.