Alberty v. Dawson

1 Binn. 105, 1804 Pa. LEXIS 42
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 12, 1804·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Shippen C. J.

A limited authority, such as. is given to justices of the peace, must be strictly pursued. They cannot interfere officially in a civil controversy without pursuing the steps pointed out by the act.

Smith J.

It has always been held that if the proceeding was neither by summons nor capias, it ivas irregular.

Per Curiam. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alberty v. Dawson, 1 Binn. 105, 1804 Pa. LEXIS 42 (Pa. 1804).

1 Binn. 105 (Alberty v. Dawson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Willer v. French
27 Ill. App. 76 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1888)
Truitt Bros. & Co. v. Ludwig, Kneedler & Co.
25 Pa. 145 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1855)
Feger v. Kroh
6 Watts 294 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1837)