Home/Louisiana Court of Appeal/Albertson's, Inc. v. Stutes

Albertson's, Inc. v. Stutes

801 So. 2d 514, 1 La.App. 3 Cir. 302, 2001 La. App. LEXIS 2105, 2001 WL 1161457
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedOctober 3, 2001
DocketNo. 01-302
StatusPublished

This text of 801 So. 2d 514 (Albertson's, Inc. v. Stutes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Albertson's, Inc. v. Stutes, 801 So. 2d 514, 1 La.App. 3 Cir. 302, 2001 La. App. LEXIS 2105, 2001 WL 1161457 (La. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This matter before the court presents no legal issues for review. It is strictly before us regarding a review of the factual findings of the workers’ compensation judge. Factual findings of a workers’ compensation judge may not be disturbed on appeal unless we find the workers’ compensation judge was clearly wrong or manifestly erroneous. Rosell v. ESCO, 549 So.2d 840 (La.1989). Upon reviewing the record as a whole, we find no manifest error in the ruling of the workers’ compensation judge. Accordingly, the judgment of the workers’ compensation judge is af[515]*515firmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed to the appellant.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rosell v. Esco
549 So. 2d 840 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
801 So. 2d 514, 1 La.App. 3 Cir. 302, 2001 La. App. LEXIS 2105, 2001 WL 1161457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albertsons-inc-v-stutes-lactapp-2001.