Albertson's Inc. v. Ferrell

647 So. 2d 242, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11121, 1994 WL 637305
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 16, 1994·No. No. 93-2783·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon a careful review of the record, we conclude that none of the issues raised by the employer and servicing agent in this workers’ compensation case merits reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. We note that our affir-mance is based upon the order entered on July 29, 1993. The amended order appears to have been entered after the notice of appeal was filed. While the changes contained in the amended order are not relevant to the issues raised on appeal, they constitute more than the mere correction of clerical errors. Therefore, the judge of compensation claims lacked jurisdiction to enter the amended order, and it is a nullity. See Fla. R.Work.Comp.P. 4.141(c), 4.160(h), 4.165(g).

AFFIRMED.

ALLEN, WEBSTER and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Albertson's Inc. v. Ferrell, 647 So. 2d 242, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11121, 1994 WL 637305 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

647 So. 2d 242 (Albertson's Inc. v. Ferrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

CHARLENE MARIE DURYEA v. KEITH ROBERT BONO
249 So. 3d 780 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Haines v. State
805 So. 2d 972 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)