Albertson's, Inc. v. Dean

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Albertson's, Inc. v. Dean

827 P.2d 206, 112 Or. App. 215, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 578

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMarch 25, 1992

Docket88-14751; CA A67590

StatusPublished

This text of 827 P.2d 206 (Albertson's, Inc. v. Dean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Albertson's, Inc. v. Dean, 827 P.2d 206, 112 Or. App. 215, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 578 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that claimant is permanently and totally disabled. There is substantial evidence to support the Board’s decision, and we affirm it.

Claimant has pointed out in his cross-petition that the Board’s order incorrectly notes that the referee’s order being affirmed is the order dated July 14, 1989. In fact, the referee issued a second amended order on August 7,1989, and that is the order from which employer appealed to the Board. The Board’s order should be modified to reflect that the referee’s order being affirmed is the order of August 7,1989.

Affirmed on petition; remanded on cross-petition for correction of date error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that claimant is permanently and totally disabled. There is substantial evidence to support the Board’s decision, and we affirm it.

Claimant has pointed out in his cross-petition that the Board’s order incorrectly notes that the referee’s order being affirmed is the order dated July 14, 1989. In fact, the referee issued a second amended order on August 7,1989, and that is the order from which employer appealed to the Board. The Board’s order should be modified to reflect that the referee’s order being affirmed is the order of August 7,1989.

Affirmed on petition; remanded on cross-petition for correction of date error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

827 P.2d 206, 112 Or. App. 215, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albertsons-inc-v-dean-orctapp-1992.