Albertson v. Nix
This text of 57 N.E.2d 206 (Albertson v. Nix) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— This is an attempt to appeal from a judgment of the Perry Circuit Court in an ejectment proceeding.
The appellees have not questioned the sufficiency of appellants’ brief. However, this court is bound by the Rules of the Supreme Court. Appellants’ brief wholly fails to comply with Rule 2-17. It does not set out the judgment of the trial court, the motion for a new trial or the substance thereof, the exhibit which it is asserted was erroneously admitted in evidence, or the substance of said exhibit.
*129 While this court indulges a practical liberality in passing upon the sufficiency of briefs, the application of the rules may not be relaxed to the point of requiring us to search the record for grounds to reverse a judgment. Wabash Township, Gibson County et al. v. Cooper et al. (1943), 221 Ind. 304, 47 N. E. (2d) 611.
No question having been presented, the judgment of the Perry Circuit Court is affirmed.
Note. — Reported in 57 N. E. (2d) 206.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 N.E.2d 206, 115 Ind. App. 128, 1944 Ind. App. LEXIS 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albertson-v-nix-indctapp-1944.