Alberts v. CSTV Networks, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Alberts v. CSTV Networks, Inc.

96 A.D.3d 447, 945 N.Y.S.2d 555

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 7, 2012

StatusPublished

This text of 96 A.D.3d 447 (Alberts v. CSTV Networks, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alberts v. CSTV Networks, Inc., 96 A.D.3d 447, 945 N.Y.S.2d 555 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol R. Edmead, J.), entered March 9, 2011, which granted defendant broadcasting network’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint for breach of contract, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court correctly concluded that plaintiff materially breached his contract with defendant by accepting the position of athletics director at the University of Nebraska-Omaha, while still under contract with defendant. The agreement between the parties plainly contemplated that plaintiff would be available to defendant on a full-time basis for the entire term of the agreement, an obligation he could not fulfill while running a university athletics program 1,500 miles away from defendant’s New York studios. Moreover, plaintiffs media appearances were to be exclusive to defendant, an agreement he breached by making media appearances as the head of the university’s athletics department. Plaintiff s breaches were material as a matter of law, as they were substantial enough to defeat the parties’ objectives in making the contract (see Robert Cohn Assoc., Inc. v Kosich, 63 AD3d 1388, 1389 [2009]). Accordingly, defendant was entitled to terminate the agreement and to withhold further payments due thereunder (see e.g. Legend Artists Mgt. v Blackmore, 273 AD2d 91 [2000]).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Friedman, Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels and Roman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol R. Edmead, J.), entered March 9, 2011, which granted defendant broadcasting network’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint for breach of contract, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court correctly concluded that plaintiff materially breached his contract with defendant by accepting the position of athletics director at the University of Nebraska-Omaha, while still under contract with defendant. The agreement between the parties plainly contemplated that plaintiff would be available to defendant on a full-time basis for the entire term of the agreement, an obligation he could not fulfill while running a university athletics program 1,500 miles away from defendant’s New York studios. Moreover, plaintiffs media appearances were to be exclusive to defendant, an agreement he breached by making media appearances as the head of the university’s athletics department. Plaintiff s breaches were material as a matter of law, as they were substantial enough to defeat the parties’ objectives in making the contract (see Robert Cohn Assoc., Inc. v Kosich, 63 AD3d 1388, 1389 [2009]). Accordingly, defendant was entitled to terminate the agreement and to withhold further payments due thereunder (see e.g. Legend Artists Mgt. v Blackmore, 273 AD2d 91 [2000]).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Friedman, Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels and Roman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 A.D.3d 447, 945 N.Y.S.2d 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alberts-v-cstv-networks-inc-nyappdiv-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack