Alberts v. Alberts

187 A. 136, 121 N.J. Eq. 48

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Alberts v. Alberts. Read the opinion of the Court — 119 N.J. Eq. 391 →

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 5, 1936·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case, on another angle, was considered by us in an opinion reported in 119 N. J. Eq. 391. The record was remitted and defendants then sought leave in chancery to submit further proofs. The vice-chancellor decided that the application should be denied. No convincing reason is presented why that conclusion should be disturbed.

The decree below will be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee- Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Heher, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, RaeEERTY, JJ. 10. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The decree below will be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee- Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Heher, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, RaeEERTY, JJ. 10. For reversal — None.

Alberts v. Alberts, 187 A. 136, 121 N.J. Eq. 48 (N.J. 1936).

Pincite

187 A. 136 (Alberts v. Alberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.