Alberto Solar-Somohano v. Federal Housing Finance Agency

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 23-11026 Document: 16-1 Date Filed: 09/25/2023 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 23-11026 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

In re: ALBERTO SOLAR SOMOHANO, Debtor. ________________________________________________ ALBERTO SOLAR-SOMOHANO, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY,

Defendant-Appellee. USCA11 Case: 23-11026 Document: 16-1 Date Filed: 09/25/2023 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 23-11026

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 1:22-cv-20299-RNS ____________________

Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR, and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. The district court’s order denying as moot Alberto Solar-So- mohano’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is not a final, appealable order. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Gomez v. United States, 245 F.2d 346, 347 (5th Cir. 1957) (stating that an order denying a motion to appeal in forma pauperis is not a final, appealable order). The proper procedure for review of such an order is to renew the motion before this Court. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5) & advisory committee notes (1967). All pending motions are denied as moot. No petition for re- hearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.