Alberto Reyes v. Eric Holder, Jr.
This text of 474 F. App'x 698 (Alberto Reyes v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Alberto Antonio Reyes, a native and citizen of Panama, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“LJ”) removal order. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law. Ramirez-Villalpando v. Holder, 645 F.3d 1035, 1038 (9th Cir.2011). We deny *699 in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.
The BIA correctly determined that Reyes’ conviction under California Health and Safety Code § 11378 constituted an aggravated felony which rendered him statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101(a)(43)(B); 1229b(a)(3); United States v. Strickland, 601 F.3d 963, 968-69 (9th Cir.2010) (en banc).
Reyes’ contention that the IJ abused her discretion in denying a continuance is moot because his motion to vacate his criminal conviction was denied. See Pedroza-Padilla v. Gonzales, 486 F.3d 1362, 1364 n. 2 (9th Cir.2007).
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s denial of voluntary departure. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
474 F. App'x 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alberto-reyes-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2012.