Alberto Plutarco Garcia v. Pi Corporation, Gilbert Kerlin, Individually and as Trustee, and Windward Oil & Gas Corporation

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 7, 2001
Docket13-01-00159-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Alberto Plutarco Garcia v. Pi Corporation, Gilbert Kerlin, Individually and as Trustee, and Windward Oil & Gas Corporation (Alberto Plutarco Garcia v. Pi Corporation, Gilbert Kerlin, Individually and as Trustee, and Windward Oil & Gas Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alberto Plutarco Garcia v. Pi Corporation, Gilbert Kerlin, Individually and as Trustee, and Windward Oil & Gas Corporation, (Tex. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-01-159-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI



___________________________________________________________________



ALBERT PLUTARCO GARCIA, ET AL. , Appellants,

v.



PI CORPORATION, ET AL. , Appellees.

___________________________________________________________________



On appeal from the 105th District Court



of Kleberg County, Texas.



___________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N



Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Dorsey and Hinojosa



Opinion Per Curiam



Appellants, ALBERT PLUTARCO GARCIA, ET AL. , attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by the 105th District Court of Kleberg County, Texas, in cause no. 00-669-D . The clerk's record was received on April 4, 2001 .

Upon review of the clerk's record, it appeared that the order from this appeal was taken was not a final appealable order. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellants were advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellants' response to this Court's notice was received and filed on May 9, 2001.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants' response to this Court's notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 7th day of June, 2001 .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Alberto Plutarco Garcia v. Pi Corporation, Gilbert Kerlin, Individually and as Trustee, and Windward Oil & Gas Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alberto-plutarco-garcia-v-pi-corporation-gilbert-k-texapp-2001.