Alberto Burrola-Moreno v. Eric Holder, Jr.
This text of 427 F. App'x 582 (Alberto Burrola-Moreno v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Alberto Burrola-Moreno, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s determination that there is reason to believe an alien is or has been an illicit trafficker in any controlled substance. Alarcon-Serrano v. INS, 220 F.3d 1116, 1119 (9th Cir.2000). We dismiss the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Burrola-Moreno is or has been an illicit trafficker in a controlled substance. See id. at 1120 (“While a generous fact-finder might have believed [petitioner’s] version of the facts, both the BIA and IJ were clearly within reason on these facts and circumstances to conclude otherwise.”). Accordingly, Burrola-Moreno is inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a) (2) (C) (i). We therefore dismiss the petition for review. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C); Lopez-Molina v. Ashcroft, 368 F.3d 1206, 1209-1211 (9th Cir.2004).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
427 F. App'x 582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alberto-burrola-moreno-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2011.