Alberti v. Automobile Shippers, Inc.

9 F.R.D. 323, 1949 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3214
District Court, N.D. Ohio·Decided July 27, 1949·No. Civ. No. 25885·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

JONES, Chief Judge.

This is a complaint for negligence wherein plaintiff allegedly suffered personal injuries as a result of a traffic accident.

Plaintiff neglected to demand a trial by jury within the time limit provided by Rule 38(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., and now moves that the Court order a trial by jury under the provisions of Rule 39(b). A stipulation has been filed whereby defendant waives any objections to the trial of the case by a jury.

Although counsel offer no explanation for their failure to demand a jury trial within the time provided by Rule 38, the facts that the defendant does not object and that this is a personal injury case and therefore “peculiarly one to be decided by a jury”, S. S. Kresge Co. v. Holland, 6 Cir., 158 F.2d 495, 497, the motion will be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alberti v. Automobile Shippers, Inc., 9 F.R.D. 323, 1949 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3214 (N.D. Ohio 1949).

9 F.R.D. 323 (Alberti v. Automobile Shippers, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alford v. Drum
361 P.2d 451 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1961)
Ligouri v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
26 F.R.D. 565 (D. Connecticut, 1961)
Ohlinger v. United States
135 F. Supp. 40 (D. Idaho, 1955)