Alberta O. Ramseur and Charles J. Ramseur v. William S. Thompson, Receiver

D.C. Circuit

Alberta O. Ramseur and Charles J. Ramseur v. William S. Thompson, Receiver

271 F.2d 458, 106 U.S. App. D.C. 192, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4831

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMay 21, 1959

Docket14864

StatusPublished

This text of 271 F.2d 458 (Alberta O. Ramseur and Charles J. Ramseur v. William S. Thompson, Receiver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alberta O. Ramseur and Charles J. Ramseur v. William S. Thompson, Receiver, 271 F.2d 458, 106 U.S. App. D.C. 192, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4831 (D.C. Cir. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

271 F.2d 458

106 U.S.App.D.C. 192

Alberta O. RAMSEUR and Charles J. Ramseur, Appellants,
v.
William S. THOMPSON, Receiver, Appellee.

No. 14864.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued April 27, 1959.
Decided May 21, 1959.

Mr. E. W. Mollohan, Jr., Washington, D.C., for appellant Charles J. Ramseur. Mr. George Johannes, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for appellant Charles J. Ramseur.

Mr. Herman Miller, Washington, D.C., was on the brief for appellant Alberta O. Ramseur.

Mr. Frederick H. Evans, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. William S. Thompson and Verginald L. Dolphin, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before BAZELON, WASHINGTON and BURGER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court awarding a fee to a receiver of certain real property involved in litigation. We find no abuse of discretion.

Affirmed.

BURGER, Circuit Judge (concurring in the result).

I would dismiss the appeal as frivolous.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI