Albert Wright v. Thomas Darnell, William Hildreth and Thomas Caunce, Review Committee, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Commodity Stabilization Service
This text of 316 F.2d 737 (Albert Wright v. Thomas Darnell, William Hildreth and Thomas Caunce, Review Committee, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Commodity Stabilization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
THIS CAUSE having come on to be heard upon the record on appeal and the briefs and argument of counsel, and it appearing therefrom that the judgment of the District Court should be affirmed 205 F.Supp. 277,
Now, Therefore, It Is Ordered that the judgment of the District Court be, and the same is, hereby affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
316 F.2d 737, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albert-wright-v-thomas-darnell-william-hildreth-and-thomas-caunce-review-ca6-1963.