Albert Wright v. Thomas Darnell, William Hildreth and Thomas Caunce, Review Committee, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Commodity Stabilization Service
316 F.2d 737, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5488
Opinion
ORDER
THIS CAUSE having come on to be heard upon the record on appeal and the briefs and argument of counsel, and it appearing therefrom that the judgment of the District Court should be affirmed 205 F.Supp. 277,
Now, Therefore, It Is Ordered that the judgment of the District Court be, and the same is, hereby affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Albert Wright v. Thomas Darnell, William Hildreth and Thomas Caunce, Review Committee, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Commodity Stabilization Service, 316 F.2d 737, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5488 (6th Cir. 1963).
316 F.2d 737 (Albert Wright v. Thomas Darnell, William Hildreth and Thomas Caunce, Review Committee, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Commodity Stabilization Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wright v. Darnell
205 F. Supp. 277 (E.D. Kentucky, 1962)