Albert Winnick v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Ida Winnick v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Sixth Circuit

Albert Winnick v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Ida Winnick v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

223 F.2d 266

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedApril 28, 1955

Docket12294

StatusPublished

This text of 223 F.2d 266 (Albert Winnick v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Ida Winnick v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Albert Winnick v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Ida Winnick v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 223 F.2d 266 (6th Cir. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

223 F.2d 266

55-1 USTC P 9419

Albert WINNICK, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
Ida WINNICK, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

Nos. 12293, 12294.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

April 28, 1955.

George L. Cassidy, William C. Loud, Detroit, Mich., for petitioners.

H. Brian Holland, Daniel A. Taylor, Ellis N. Slack, John M. Morawski and Dudley J. Godfrey, Jr., Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel in open court, and it appearing that the issues are factual, the inferences to be drawn from the evidence are for the trier of the facts, in this case, the Tax Court, and it appearing that there was no error of law in its decision and that its findings are sustained by substantial evidence on the record as a whole,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the decision of the Tax Court, 21 T.C. 1029, be and is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

223 F.2d 266

55-1 USTC P 9419

Albert WINNICK, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
Ida WINNICK, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

Nos. 12293, 12294.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

April 28, 1955.

George L. Cassidy, William C. Loud, Detroit, Mich., for petitioners.

H. Brian Holland, Daniel A. Taylor, Ellis N. Slack, John M. Morawski and Dudley J. Godfrey, Jr., Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel in open court, and it appearing that the issues are factual, the inferences to be drawn from the evidence are for the trier of the facts, in this case, the Tax Court, and it appearing that there was no error of law in its decision and that its findings are sustained by substantial evidence on the record as a whole,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the decision of the Tax Court, 21 T.C. 1029, be and is hereby affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

223 F.2d 266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albert-winnick-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue--ca6-1955.