Albert v. Solimon
This text of 721 N.E.2d 17 (Albert v. Solimon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, without costs. We agree with Supreme Court and the Appellate Division that the examination room of the medical office of the orthopedic surgeon, into which plaintiff brought her service dog, was not a “public facility” within the meaning of Civil Rights Law § 47. No other issue is before us.
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Wesley and Rosenblatt. Taking no part: Judge CiPARICK.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
721 N.E.2d 17, 94 N.Y.2d 771, 699 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 4052, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albert-v-solimon-ny-1999.