Albert v. Salemi

431 So. 2d 345, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20749
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 18, 1983·No. No. 82-2687·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the basis and authority of section 440.11(1), Florida Statutes (1981); Chorak v. Naughton, 409 So.2d 35 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Dessert v. Electric Mutual Liability Insurance Co., 392 So.2d 340 (Fla. 5th DCA), pet. for review denied, 399 So.2d 1141 (Fla.1981); Zurich Insurance Co. v. Scofi, 366 So.2d 1193 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 378 So.2d 348 (Fla.1979) and West v. Jessop, 339 So.2d 1136 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).

SCHEB, Acting C.J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Albert v. Salemi, 431 So. 2d 345, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20749 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

431 So. 2d 345 (Albert v. Salemi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florida Dept. of Transp. v. Juliano
864 So. 2d 11 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Kaplan v. CIRCUIT COURT OF TENTH JUD. CIRCUIT
495 So. 2d 231 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)