Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Albert v. Lust

Albert v. Lust

270 A.D. 751, 59 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3783
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 11, 1946
StatusPublished

This text of 270 A.D. 751 (Albert v. Lust) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Albert v. Lust, 270 A.D. 751, 59 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3783 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Opinion

Order unanimously modified so that the defendant will only be required to particularize concerning such claims of contributory negligence as it intends to assert in addition to those it may be able to develop on the cross-examination. (Murrain v. Wilson Line, Inc., 266 App. Div. 179; Captan v. Associated Transport, Inc., 269 App. Div. 936.) Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Dore and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murrain v. Wilson Line, Inc.
266 A.D. 179 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943)
Captan v. Associated Transport, Inc.
269 A.D. 936 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
270 A.D. 751, 59 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albert-v-lust-nyappdiv-1946.