Albert v. Farm Bureau Insurance Co.
This text of 861 So. 2d 551 (Albert v. Farm Bureau Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Lafayette Parish School; Neus-trom, Michael;- — Defendant(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 2001-6118; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 03-01191.
Denied. The court of appeal’s conclusion that Mr. Broussard was engaged in a business pursuit for purposes of his homeowner’s policy does not preclude relator from arguing Mr. Broussard was not in the course and scope of his employment, as those terms serve different purposes in separate contexts. See LeBlanc v. Broussard, 396 So.2d 535 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1981).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
861 So. 2d 551, 2003 La. LEXIS 3680, 2003 WL 23148868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albert-v-farm-bureau-insurance-co-la-2003.