Albert v. Farm Bureau Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Albert v. Farm Bureau Insurance Co.

861 So. 2d 551, 2003 La. LEXIS 3680, 2003 WL 23148868

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided December 18, 2003·No. No. 2003-CC-3325·Published

Opinion

In re Lafayette Parish School; Neus-trom, Michael;- — Defendant(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 2001-6118; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 03-01191.

Denied. The court of appeal’s conclusion that Mr. Broussard was engaged in a business pursuit for purposes of his homeowner’s policy does not preclude relator from arguing Mr. Broussard was not in the course and scope of his employment, as those terms serve different purposes in separate contexts. See LeBlanc v. Broussard, 396 So.2d 535 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1981).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Lafayette Parish School; Neus-trom, Michael;- — Defendant(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 2001-6118; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 03-01191.

Denied. The court of appeal’s conclusion that Mr. Broussard was engaged in a business pursuit for purposes of his homeowner’s policy does not preclude relator from arguing Mr. Broussard was not in the course and scope of his employment, as those terms serve different purposes in separate contexts. See LeBlanc v. Broussard, 396 So.2d 535 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1981).

Albert v. Farm Bureau Insurance Co., 861 So. 2d 551, 2003 La. LEXIS 3680, 2003 WL 23148868 (La. 2003).

Pincite

861 So. 2d 551 (Albert v. Farm Bureau Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related