Albert v. Albert

690 So. 2d 734, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3129, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 851
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 2, 1997·No. Nos. 95-4355, 96-0402·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal and cross appeal from a judgment of dissolution of marriage. Although the former husband has raised several issues on appeal, we affirm as to all but one — the award of attorney’s fees and costs to the former wife. The equitable distribution of the marital assets left the parties in substantial financial parity. Under these circumstances, it was an abuse of discretion for the trial judge to require the former husband to pay the former wife’s attorney’s fees and costs. Kovar v. Kovar, 648 So.2d 177, 179 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

[735]*735As to the former wife’s cross appeal, having carefully considered the merits, we affirm.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.

GUNTHER, C.J., and DELL and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Albert v. Albert, 690 So. 2d 734, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3129, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 851 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

690 So. 2d 734 (Albert v. Albert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reed v. Reed
710 So. 2d 727 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)