Albert Soto Medina v. J. J. Enomoto, Superintendent, California Correctional Inst.

521 F.2d 794, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 12840
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 8, 1975
Docket74-2682
StatusPublished

This text of 521 F.2d 794 (Albert Soto Medina v. J. J. Enomoto, Superintendent, California Correctional Inst.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Albert Soto Medina v. J. J. Enomoto, Superintendent, California Correctional Inst., 521 F.2d 794, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 12840 (9th Cir. 1975).

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The order denying Medina’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus is vacated, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings. The opinion of this court in Mann v. Smith, 488 F.2d 245 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 932, 94 S.Ct. 1445, 39 L.Ed.2d 490 (1974), upon which the district court based its decision, was subsequently overruled by Lefkowitz v. Newsome, 420 U.S. 283, 95 S.Ct. 886, 43 L.Ed.2d 196 (1975).

Vacated and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lefkowitz v. Newsome
420 U.S. 283 (Supreme Court, 1975)
Mann v. Smith
488 F.2d 245 (Ninth Circuit, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
521 F.2d 794, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 12840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albert-soto-medina-v-j-j-enomoto-superintendent-california-ca9-1975.