Albert Smith v. the Villages at Kitty Hawk
This text of Albert Smith v. the Villages at Kitty Hawk (Albert Smith v. the Villages at Kitty Hawk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
§ ALBERT SMITH, No. 08-10-00203-CV § Appellant, Appeal from § v. County Court at Law No. 10 § THE VILLAGES AT KITTY HAWK, of Bexar County, Texas § Appellee. (TC # 359,757) §
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be
dismissed. Because Appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time, we dismiss the
appeal for want of prosecution.
On September 24, 2010, the clerk of this Court notified Appellant that his brief was past due
and that no motion for extension of time had been received. The clerk also informed the parties of
the Court’s intent to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days of the notice,
a party responded showing grounds to continue the appeal. To this date, no one has responded to
the clerk’s letter.
This Court has the authority to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when the appellant
has failed to file his brief in the time prescribed and gives no reasonable explanation for the failure
to do so. TEX .R.APP .P. 38.8(a)(1); Elizondo v. City of San Antonio, 975 S.W.2d 61, 63 (Tex.App.--
San Antonio 1998, no pet.). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.
November 30, 2010 ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice
Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Albert Smith v. the Villages at Kitty Hawk, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albert-smith-v-the-villages-at-kitty-hawk-texapp-2010.