Albert Saggese, Inc. v. Town of Hempstead

477 N.E.2d 617, 64 N.Y.2d 908, 488 N.Y.S.2d 376, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 15743
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 19, 1985
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 477 N.E.2d 617 (Albert Saggese, Inc. v. Town of Hempstead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Albert Saggese, Inc. v. Town of Hempstead, 477 N.E.2d 617, 64 N.Y.2d 908, 488 N.Y.S.2d 376, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 15743 (N.Y. 1985).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified by providing that, on its second cause of action against the joint venture and its third counterclaim against the town, Royal shall *911 have judgment against the town in the amount of $54,060 and payment of that amount to Royal shall extinguish the town’s obligation on the award of judgment in that reduced amount to the joint venture and, as so modified, order affirmed, with costs to the town against the joint venture and Royal. The weight of the evidence comports with the conclusion that the items claimed as extras, other than the additional pile lengths, resulted from plaintiff’s failure adequately to gauge the cost of performance or from changes made as an accommodation to plaintiff and at its request rather than as a result of mutual mistake or of any fundamental change in the contract ordered by the town or its engineer. Modification is, however, required because the surety, as assignee of mechanic’s lienors paid by it on plaintiff’s behalf, rather than the plaintiff, is entitled to such moneys as may be due from the town.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander concur.

Order modified in accordance with the memorandum herein and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to the town against the joint venture and Royal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

GVC II, Inc. v. Contract Dispute Resolution Board
46 A.D.3d 468 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Metro Group Construction Corp. v. Town of Hempstead
24 A.D.3d 632 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
National States Electric Corp. v. City of New York
225 A.D.2d 745 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Huff Enterprises, Inc. v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority
191 A.D.2d 314 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
A.I. Smith Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Fire Department
176 A.D.2d 149 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Buckley & Co. v. City of New York
121 A.D.2d 933 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Melwood Construction Corp. v. State
119 A.D.2d 734 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
477 N.E.2d 617, 64 N.Y.2d 908, 488 N.Y.S.2d 376, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 15743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albert-saggese-inc-v-town-of-hempstead-ny-1985.