Albert R. House v. Nathan Mayo, State Prison Custodian of Florida

276 F.2d 42

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant has added another to his many earlier efforts 1 to obtain his release from detention by the State of Florida. We find no error in the denial by the district court of the appellant’s application for a writ of habeas corpus. Its judgment is

Affirmed.

1 . State ex rel. House v. Mayo, 122 Fla. 23, 164 So. 673; House v. State, 127 Fla. 145, 172 So. 734; House v. State, 130 Fla. 400, 177 So. 705; House v. Mayo, 5 Cir., 1944, 147 F.2d 606, reversed 324 U.S. 42, 65 S.Ct. 517, 89 L.Ed. 739; House v. Mayo, D.C.S.D.Fla., 1945, 63 F.Supp. 169, affirmed 5 Cir., 151 F.2d 1014, certiorari denied 326 U.S. 792, 66 S.Ct. 478, 90 L.Ed. 481, rehearing denied 327 U.S. 814, 66 S.Ct. 527, 90 L.Ed. 1038; House v. Mayo, 5 Cir., 1946, 158 F.2d 90; Ex parte House, 159 Fla. 385, 31 So.2d 633, certiorari denied House v. Mayo, 332 U.S. 834, 68 S.Ct. 211, 92 L.Ed. 407; House v. Mayo, D.C.S.D.Fla.1949, 85 F.Supp. 365.