Albert Properties, Inc. v. Vizcaya at Palm-Aire Ass'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Albert Properties, Inc. v. Vizcaya at Palm-Aire Ass'n

841 So. 2d 674, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4805, 2003 WL 1824900

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 9, 2003

DocketNo. 4D02-1009

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 841 So. 2d 674 (Albert Properties, Inc. v. Vizcaya at Palm-Aire Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Albert Properties, Inc. v. Vizcaya at Palm-Aire Ass'n, 841 So. 2d 674, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4805, 2003 WL 1824900 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review an order of the trial court dismissing with prejudice the appel[675]*675lants’ seven-count complaint, citing res ju-dicata, a prior settlement agreement, and the insufficiency of the allegations as to the individual board members. We hold that, in dismissing the seven counts, the trial court impermissibly looked beyond the four corners of the complaint. See Lost Tree Village Corp. v. City of Vero Beach, 838 So.2d 561, 569 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)(“ ‘A court may not go beyond the four corners of the complaint and must accept the facts alleged therein and exhibits attached as true.’ ”)(quoting Taylor v. City of Riviera Beach, 801 So.2d 259, 262 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), review denied, 821 So.2d 293 (Fla.2002)). Moreover, at this juncture, none of the alternative grounds advanced by the appellees are sufficient to save the dismissal with prejudice. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

STEVENSON, HAZOURI and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have for review an order of the trial court dismissing with prejudice the appel[675]*675lants’ seven-count complaint, citing res ju-dicata, a prior settlement agreement, and the insufficiency of the allegations as to the individual board members. We hold that, in dismissing the seven counts, the trial court impermissibly looked beyond the four corners of the complaint. See Lost Tree Village Corp. v. City of Vero Beach, 838 So.2d 561, 569 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)(“ ‘A court may not go beyond the four corners of the complaint and must accept the facts alleged therein and exhibits attached as true.’ ”)(quoting Taylor v. City of Riviera Beach, 801 So.2d 259, 262 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), review denied, 821 So.2d 293 (Fla.2002)). Moreover, at this juncture, none of the alternative grounds advanced by the appellees are sufficient to save the dismissal with prejudice. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

STEVENSON, HAZOURI and MAY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

841 So. 2d 674, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4805, 2003 WL 1824900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albert-properties-inc-v-vizcaya-at-palm-aire-assn-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack