Albert Pipe Supply Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Albert Pipe Supply Co. v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 512

United States Customs Court·Decided May 24, 1957·No. No. 60787; protests 287468-K, etc. (Galveston)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “limited service” seamless steel oil-well casings the same in all material respects as those the subject of United Supply & Mfg. Co., The Crispin Company v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 95, C. D. 1804), the items marked “A” were held dutiable at one-tenth of 1 cent per pound and the items marked “B” at 7percent ad valorem under paragraph 312, as modified, supra, as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “limited service” seamless steel oil-well casings the same in all material respects as those the subject of United Supply & Mfg. Co., The Crispin Company v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 95, C. D. 1804), the items marked “A” were held dutiable at one-tenth of 1 cent per pound and the items marked “B” at 7percent ad valorem under paragraph 312, as modified, supra, as claimed.

Albert Pipe Supply Co. v. United States, 38 Cust. Ct. 512 (cusc 1957).

Pincite

38 Cust. Ct. 512 (Albert Pipe Supply Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related