Albert Pipe Supply Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Albert Pipe Supply Co. v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 512

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMay 24, 1957

DocketNo. 60787; protests 287468-K, etc. (Galveston)

StatusPublished

This text of 38 Cust. Ct. 512 (Albert Pipe Supply Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Albert Pipe Supply Co. v. United States, 38 Cust. Ct. 512 (cusc 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “limited service” seamless steel oil-well casings the same in all material respects as those the subject of United Supply & Mfg. Co., The Crispin Company v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 95, C. D. 1804), the items marked “A” were held dutiable at one-tenth of 1 cent per pound and the items marked “B” at 7percent ad valorem under paragraph 312, as modified, supra, as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “limited service” seamless steel oil-well casings the same in all material respects as those the subject of United Supply & Mfg. Co., The Crispin Company v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 95, C. D. 1804), the items marked “A” were held dutiable at one-tenth of 1 cent per pound and the items marked “B” at 7percent ad valorem under paragraph 312, as modified, supra, as claimed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 Cust. Ct. 512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albert-pipe-supply-co-v-united-states-cusc-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack