Albert Palomino v. State
This text of Albert Palomino v. State (Albert Palomino v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
December 20, 2011
JUDGMENT
The Fourteenth Court of Appeals
ALBERT PALOMINO, Appellant
NO. 14-10-00926-CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee ____________________
This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below, and having inspected the record, this Court holds there was no error in the judgment requiring reversal, but there was error in the judgment as entered, which is capable of reformation by this Court. Therefore, the judgment is REFORMED, to reflect that the indictment alleged two enhancement paragraphs to which appellant pleaded "not true," and the trial court found to be true.
The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED as REFORMED, and further orders the appellant pay all costs expended in this appeal, and orders this decision certified below for observance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Albert Palomino v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albert-palomino-v-state-texapp-2011.