Albert Ortiz v. the Junell Law Firm, Sanders & Junell P.C., Mark Junell, Individualy, and Bergman ADR Group

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 17, 2013·No. 14-12-00126-CV·Published

Opinion

January 17, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ALBERT ORTIZ, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00126-CV V.

THE JUNELL LAW FIRM, SANDERS & JUNELL P.C., MARK JUNELL, INDIVIDUALLY, AND BERGMAN ADR GROUP, Appellees

Today the Court heard appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on October 31, 2011. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant, Albert Ortiz.

We further order that mandate be issued immediately. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Albert Ortiz v. the Junell Law Firm, Sanders & Junell P.C., Mark Junell, Individualy, and Bergman ADR Group, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Albert Ortiz v. the Junell Law Firm, Sanders & Junell P.C., Mark Junell, Individualy, and Bergman ADR Group (Albert Ortiz v. the Junell Law Firm, Sanders & Junell P.C., Mark Junell, Individualy, and Bergman ADR Group) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.