Albert Ortiz v. the Junell Law Firm, Sanders & Junell P.C., Mark Junell, Individualy, and Bergman ADR Group
This text of Albert Ortiz v. the Junell Law Firm, Sanders & Junell P.C., Mark Junell, Individualy, and Bergman ADR Group (Albert Ortiz v. the Junell Law Firm, Sanders & Junell P.C., Mark Junell, Individualy, and Bergman ADR Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
January 17, 2013
JUDGMENT
The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ALBERT ORTIZ, Appellant
NO. 14-12-00126-CV V.
THE JUNELL LAW FIRM, SANDERS & JUNELL P.C., MARK JUNELL, INDIVIDUALLY, AND BERGMAN ADR GROUP, Appellees ________________________________
Today the Court heard appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on October 31, 2011. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.
We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant, Albert Ortiz. We further order that mandate be issued immediately. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Albert Ortiz v. the Junell Law Firm, Sanders & Junell P.C., Mark Junell, Individualy, and Bergman ADR Group, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albert-ortiz-v-the-junell-law-firm-sanders-junell--texapp-2013.