Albert Monroe v. Wayne McAllister Warden

23 F.3d 402, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18529, 1994 WL 175550
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 10, 1994·No. 93-7288·Published

Opinion

23 F.3d 402
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Albert MONROE, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Wayne McALLISTER, Warden, et al., Defendant Appellee.

No. 93-7288.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 21, 1994.
Decided: May 10, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-93-2191-WN)

Albert Monroe, appellant pro se.

John G. Packard, Baltimore, MD, for appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Monroe v. McAllister, No. CA-93-2191-WN (D. Md. Nov. 15, 1993). We deny Monroe's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Albert Monroe v. Wayne McAllister Warden, 23 F.3d 402, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18529, 1994 WL 175550 (4th Cir. 1994).

23 F.3d 402 (Albert Monroe v. Wayne McAllister Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.