Albert Michael Sculley v. United States
This text of 355 F.2d 203 (Albert Michael Sculley v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was indicted for transporting a stolen vehicle in interstate commerce from Franklin County, Florida to Thomas County, Georgia in violation of the Dyer Act. 18 U.S.C.A. § 2312. He was found guilty as charged, and this appeal is from the judgment of conviction entered on the jury verdict.
We find no error in the court’s charge. It was made plain to the jury that the identity of the automobile and the identity of appellant were central issues in the case. There being a sufficiency of evidence, it follows that the judgment should be, and it is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
355 F.2d 203, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 7372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albert-michael-sculley-v-united-states-ca5-1966.