Albert Matthew Estrada v. the State of Texas
Opinion
NUMBER 13-24-00270-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
ALBERT MATTHEW ESTRADA, Appellant, v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
ON APPEAL FROM THE 464TH DISTRICT COURT OF HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Tijerina and Peña Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina
This cause is before the Court on appellant’s motion to dismiss this appeal.
Appellant’s counsel filed the motion and attached a signed and sworn verification confirming appellant’s desire to dismiss the appeal. We find the motion and signed, sworn verification meet the requirement of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) that appellant and attorney must sign a written motion to dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss and dismiss the appeal.
Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained.
JAIME TIJERINA
Justice
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed on the 11th day of July, 2024.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Albert Matthew Estrada v. the State of Texas (Albert Matthew Estrada v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.