Albert Lutterodt v. Emily Lane Owners Association, Inc.
This text of Albert Lutterodt v. Emily Lane Owners Association, Inc. (Albert Lutterodt v. Emily Lane Owners Association, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered June 2, 2016
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01329-CV
ALBERT LUTTERODT, Appellant
V.
EMILY LANE OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., ENVISION REALTY GROUP, LLC, AND JACKSON POTTER, Appellees
On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-12648-G
ORDER It has come to the Court’s attention that the clerk’s record is incomplete. We ORDER
the clerk to file a supplemental record containing the following documents: appellant’s motion
for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (which may be titled Judgment Non Obstante
Verdicto), any opposition filed by appellees to appellant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding
the verdict, Bruce Turner’s motion for withdrawal of counsel, and any opposition to the motion
to withdraw. The supplemental record shall be filed no later than June 13, 2016.
/s/ LANA MYERS PRESIDING JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Albert Lutterodt v. Emily Lane Owners Association, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albert-lutterodt-v-emily-lane-owners-association-inc-texapp-2016.