Albert L. Johnson v. U.S. Parole Commission
This text of 411 F. App'x 936 (Albert L. Johnson v. U.S. Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Federal inmate Albert Johnson appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Upon careful review, we conclude that Johnson is not entitled to habeas relief for the reasons relied upon by the district court. See Mitchell v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, 538 F.3d 948, 951 (8th Cir.2008) (per curiam) (standard of review). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Johnson’s motion for appointment of counsel.
. The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, then United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota, now United States District Judge.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
411 F. App'x 936, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albert-l-johnson-v-us-parole-commission-ca8-2011.