Albert Joseph Fratarcangeli v. Sarah Myers
This text of Albert Joseph Fratarcangeli v. Sarah Myers (Albert Joseph Fratarcangeli v. Sarah Myers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
March 31, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano 161627 Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh Elizabeth M. Welch, ALBERT JOSEPH FRATARCANGELI, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, v SC: 161627 COA: 347390 Oakland CC: 2018-166053-CZ SARAH MYERS, MICHAEL SUMMERS, JAMES BOWIE, OAKLAND COUNTY, WILLIAM PERRY, DAVID WEAVER III, BRANDON HALL, SAMUEL JAMES, PHILIP DUROCHER, and DANIELLE VEATCH, Defendants-Appellees.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 9, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. March 31, 2021 s0324 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Albert Joseph Fratarcangeli v. Sarah Myers, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albert-joseph-fratarcangeli-v-sarah-myers-mich-2021.