Albert J. Ottaviano v. Reading Company

Third Circuit

Albert J. Ottaviano v. Reading Company

222 F.2d 958, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3914

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJune 17, 1955

Docket11580_1

StatusPublished

This text of 222 F.2d 958 (Albert J. Ottaviano v. Reading Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Albert J. Ottaviano v. Reading Company, 222 F.2d 958, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3914 (3d Cir. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this personal injury Federal Employers’ Liability action arising out of an accident, the jury found for the plaintiff.

The defendant urges here, as it did below, that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence and that it was excessive. As to the latter, the court below specifically found that “the amount of the verdict is not so excessive as to shock the conscience of the Court.” Our examination of the record discloses no error. The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this personal injury Federal Employers’ Liability action arising out of an accident, the jury found for the plaintiff.

The defendant urges here, as it did below, that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence and that it was excessive. As to the latter, the court below specifically found that “the amount of the verdict is not so excessive as to shock the conscience of the Court.” Our examination of the record discloses no error. The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

222 F.2d 958, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albert-j-ottaviano-v-reading-company-ca3-1955.